Monday, September 4, 2017

The Relevance of Community Service Groups

             The societal changes over the last quarter of a century have been numerous.  Many fall into the unwelcome category.  The abrasive nature of conversation, whether it be in person or via social media has reduced civility.  The constant din of point/counterpoint presented by the broadcast media borders on disrespect and causes many to exclaim, “I can’t take this anymore.”  It’s one of the reasons I got out of the profession after 35 years. I just could take the negativity any longer. But I will argue in this and in future posts to this blog as part of this series that there is reason for hope.   

              You see, I am an Optimist, (capitalization intended)  and the organization I now represent along with other century old, similar organizations can be and are relevant in these times.

                The hope can be seen in the daily communications received from the general public through the Optimist International www.optimist.org web portal.  It’s how the public communicates with the organization when it wants more information, or is inquiring about membership or starting a new Optimist group in a community.  I see each one whether it comes from the U.S., Canada, the Caribbean nations or anywhere else in the world.  Every day people are reaching out, searching for something positive to counteract the incessant negativity that seems to be prevalent in society today. They are searching for hope.  

             The forthcoming blog posts over the next couple of weeks are designed to debunk the notion that service organizations are something from the 20th century that should be put on the shelf and retired.  Optimists, Lions, Kiwanians, Rotarians and many other similar organizations are re-making themselves to not only serve their existing base but also to branch out to new segments of society, new cultures and new endeavors to help address just a portion of what troubles our society today.


               A gentleman from Colorado who was leaving our organization after a couple of decades of membership opined recently, “There is no ethical or practical commitment to be married to any organization, profit or non-profit, for a lifetime. It belongs in bygone era.”    In the words of rock music legend Sting, “I do not subscribe to that point of view,”  

              There  are too many benefits to be gained through association with a service organization whether you are in your 20’s or in your 80’s.  Future posts will make the case for those benefits and bolster the contention there is a hope to be found in associating with a service group and the belief that century old organizations remain very relevant in the 21st century.

3 comments:

  1. The need to be more relevant and adjust what a "Club" looks like in my opinion. I, and many other Optimists I know, have children in their 30s & 40s that do not belong and don't want to belong to an organization that requires them to pay a fee, come to meetings and then work (volunteer) at events throughout the year. They are so busy with children of their own or are single parents and don't have the time nor money in some cases. We've lost a couple generations of potential Optimists and those generations would help us connect more easily with new generations of potential Optimist members. It becomes more difficult for members in their 60s and 70s to "connect" with younger people in their 20s and even 30s.
    To be relevant is an important key and that must be communicated and practiced if we are to survive in the 21st Century. Most Optimists I know do not desire to depart the organization, but we struggle with the answers that seem broader than most of us can navigate. We are Optimists, so we will continue to explore ways to maintain and grow our beliefs. There aren't many good people in this world that can look at what we do and stand for and say it's not worthwhile.
    Thanks for the chance to express an opinion from a 30+ year Optimist.
    Randy Robinson

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well said Randy.I agree wholeheartedly that we need to "reinvent" ourselves while staying true to what got us through the first 100 years. I try to do it by de-emphasizing meetings, emphasizing projects and trying to zero in on the ability of members to improve themselves. Just some of what future blog posts will cover. Thanks for the read.

    ReplyDelete